| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Colleagues: I am having a hard time word-smithing the correct text for
this comment. I don’t think Geoff’s
response does a significantly better job of clarifying than the original
text. Please submit some possible
changes to the text to resolve this comment. Thanks. ----------- CommentID: 323 CommenterName: Thompson,
Geoff CommenterEmail:
thompson@xxxxxxxx CommenterPhone: 408 495
1339 CommenterFax: CommenterCo: Nortel
Networks Clause: 33 Subclause: 33.2.1.3 Page: 39 Line: 3 CommentType: E Comment: The text: "A PSE
device may provide power via one of two valid four-wire connections. In each
four-wire connection, the two wires associated with a pair carry the same
nominal current in each conductor." does not specifically differentiate between a phantom circuit and two
unbalanced circuits. I would prefer that the text more specifically denote our
use of a phantom circuit. CommentEnd: SuggestedRemedy: How about: "A PSE device may provide power via one of two valid four-wire
connections. In each four-wire connection, the two conductors associated with a
pair each carry the same nominal current in both magnitude and polarity." ...or I am open to suggestion. RemedyEnd: Response: ResponseEnd: CommentStatus: X ResponseStatus: O Topic: CreateDate: 1/3/2003 LastModDate: 1/3/2003 DispatchDate: WrittenDate: Accept_RejectDate: Closed_UnsatisfDate: VoterStatus: Chad Jones cmjones@xxxxxxxxx Hardware
Engineer Phone:
330-664-7818 WNBU
Engineering Fax:
330-664-7990 Cisco Systems 320 Springside
Drive Suite 350 Akron, OH
44333-4500 www.cisco.com
|